If you've been around for a while you might remember the Heartbreak Paper. At a meeting for junior faculty about networking I had a genius idea. I emailed someone who is a huge name in her field, which is adjacent to mine, and asked if she'd like to collaborate on a paper. I mean, what would you do if you were a huge name and some random assistant professor in an adjacent field asked you to collaborate on a paper? You'd delete the email, right? Instead she wrote right back. Sure, she said. You write the first draft and I'll write the second. At the time I kept saying, "I feel like I cold-called Beyonce and asked her to record some duets with me, and she said yes."
In this fashion we wrote a really excellent paper and sent it off to a journal in my field, where the peer review process was woefully mishandled. I bet I put a hundred hours' worth of work into revising it based on the reviewers' input, and then after I addressed all of their comments they rejected the resubmission. When I got the decision email I closed my office door and cried at my desk. It turns out that creating a toehold for interdisciplinary work is really hard -- harder than you might think. But I kept going back to the manuscript and thinking to myself, "This is the best damned academic writing I have ever done, and it deserves a home." So I persevered, and eventually I got it published. I turned it into two publications, actually, because that first set of reviewers made me add so much stuff that it wouldn't all fit into a single paper. Both papers were published in a third-tier journal, but it was a peer-reviewed outlet and it was also a venue that's easily accessible to clinicians, the target audience.
On the strength of that first paper, my co-author and I received an invitation last summer to present a 3-hour seminar at my discipline's national convention, a special seminar that would cost attendees extra money. (That part felt like extra responsibility, above and beyond the 3-hour seminar part.) We worked up our presentation and gave it in November. Over the years that we had worked on these two papers, I had started thinking of her as more of a colleague, less of a rock star. But let me tell you, she blew the room away. So much experience, so adroitly presented. Afterward I said to my roommate, "I feel like I got Beyonce to give a private concert at our convention."
Just yesterday I got our ratings for the session: 4.77 out of 5. I tell you this not to brag on myself as a presenter, because I deliberately kept my segment modest in scope. "I think they'll really want to hear what you have to say," I kept saying, and it appears that I was right.
Some days my job feels fairly thankless. I do not love curriculum debates. I do not love repeated conversations about why that half-point deduction is reasonable and will stand. Sometimes peer review makes me want to turn to fiction writing instead of science. But I looked at that email and thought about the roomful of people who had been able to learn something new, something valuable, something to help the families they work with, and who had appreciated the opportunity. And it made me glad that I had persevered.
Recent Comments